LdC Template #12
Influential Practitioners (Leadership Challenge): Leading in a COP
Enhancing Action Research and Leadership Possibilities
through the Development of your Collaborative Skills
Module 12 Name:
James D. Lett
The process below relates to the following new Leadership
Provocative Question(s):
What
research or theories have you applied so far to increase the possibility that
those involved in your problem and/or innovation are on board? Use Wenger and other sources.
Theories
for Empowerment and Engagement, Diffusion and Innovations of Change and
Communities of Practice
Kanter (1977), Weick (1993), Bentley (2009),
Wenger (1998) I have chosen the Kanter (1977) to help articulate how
empowerment and engagement improves organizational effectives at all levels.
Moreover, leveling hierarchy is an essential component to empowerment. That
mechanism is a tight knit group or community that shares an understanding of
the common community and organizational goals and their role in that goal
achievement. In the theory of collective mind, Weick (1993) discussed three
principles: contributions, representations, and subordination. Starting with
contributions and ending with subordination, heedful mindedness is a shared understanding
of what is required to do excellent work. Bentley’s (2009) innovation and
diffusion theory of change will support my conversations around creating a
shared vision, looking internally for our answers rather than externally, and
working collectively to identify opportunities for growth and to address any potential
challenges along the way. All of these theories build a foundation for community
of practice. Wenger (1998) would refer to the spreading of knowledge and skills
as a shared repertoire, essential to sustaining a healthy thriving community of
practice. The other three essentials that I would highlight include mutual
engagement, joint enterprise, and negotiating meaning in practice.
|
Quote/ideas from the book; applications/instances from
your workplace setting
|
Page number
|
|
The first characteristic of practice as the source of
coherence of a community s the mutual engagement of participants.
|
Wenger (1998, 73)
|
|
The concept of collective mind is developed to explain
organizational performance in situations requiring nearly continuous operational
reliability. Collective mind is conceptualized as a pattern of heedful
interrelations of actions in a social system.
|
Weick & Roberts (1993)
|
|
Twenty-first
century education cannot succeed without becoming more explicit or
authoritative about the meaning of understanding and excellence.
|
Bentley (2009)
|
|
Empowerment can turn a manager’s attention from control
over others to more organizationally relevant matters as planning and
innovation, unlocking hidden capabilities.
|
Kanter, 1977, 278
|
|
Empowerment must….start with, and rest fundamentally on,
modification of official structural arrangements.
|
Kanter,
1977, 276
|
|
Flattening the hierarchy – removing levels and spreading
formal authority – is among the more general and important strategies.
|
Kanter, 1977, 276
|
|
It (flattening hierarchy) has the virtues of adding to the
power component of jobs (the non-routine, discretionary, and visible aspects)
along with increasing contact among managers, at the same time that it can
speed up decisions and improve communications.
|
Kanter, 1977, 276
|
|
It is always hard to get at real power issues or make
impactful changes in a power structure, since, almost by definition, those
with power have a stake in keeping it for themselves.
|
Kanter, 1977, 276
|
f. Holding an on-line
Conversation
After
participating/viewing the “fishbowl” conversation record notes here (below)
about your responses to your peers or new thoughts based on their
postings. Be certain your notes here are
comprehensive, as were your responses to peers. (If you participate as a
“fish,” in the fishbowl your notes, which should be entered below, can be much
more succinct.)
Michelle, Kevin, and Sean discussed the theories that they
have applied to their problem of practice. Kevin started the conversation.
Kevin spoke about how stages of concern can encourage buy-in. Michelle
discussed being empathetic with regard to the stages of concern. She discussed
maintaining an open mind and supporting them through their concerns. Kevin
talked about how others may also be feeling the same concerns. Michelle also
spoke about how the social networks will help improve those connections and
address those concerns. Kevin spoke about using these connections to improve
his knowledge and inform his problem of practice. Sean spoke about increasing
student engagement and how the quotes from Wenger have helped him build the
community needed to investigate his problem of practice. Sean spoke about
branching out and getting feedback from knowledgeable others. Michelle stated
that the more factors supporting the intervention including stakeholders, the
more likely the change will occur. Kevin spoke about how the goal of is to
reach the renewal stage in the Levels of Use.
g. Determining your
Leadership Challenge/New Leadership Challenge
Based on your own quotes/ideas from Wenger, your workplace
experiences, and new insights you developed as you reflected on your peers’
work, what behavior do you want to experiment with/try out for your leadership
challenge in the next few days?
Including others in the decision making process.
No comments:
Post a Comment